To what extent do the news media fulfill Habermas' definition of Essay

To what extent do the news media fulfill Habermas definition of familiar sphere - Essay ExampleBy saying meeting it does not necessarily mean practical meetings, but rather it refers to any forum in which citizens piece of ass be heard. This essay tries to research the different ways in which televisions in particular promotes the idea of general sphere. Odugbemi (2008, p.15) agrees that since televisions are among the news media that visu exclusivelyy present tense their news, they have been found to be the most preferred news medium. According to Habermas, public sphere is a domain in which public views and opinions are create (Marx, 2002, p. 295). It discharge also be said to be an discipline where heap meet, share ideas regarding the public, discuss this ideas and finally come up with a public opinion. The arena can be looked at from different perspectives for instance it can be a particular place where people meet (social halls), or it can be an infrastructural communic ation facility by which individuals can exchange opinions (television). Habermas considers the public sphere to be a utility that promotes participatory democracy, since democracy emphasizes on citizens right of expression. Marx (2002, p. 324) contends that honorable functioning of the public sphere stresses on good participatory of citizens in matters of the public like governance. Let us then make a exact analysis on the ways which televisions use to promote the public sphere, and how successful they have been. First we have to understand the fundamental role of TVs as we explore their public sphere promotional function. Odugbemi (2008, p. 33) asserts that televisions primary function is to let people be aware of new happenings across the globe. They provide important information to all the stakeholders in particular happenings for example in times of disasters. In disaster cases, they make the public aware of such a situation, so that citizens can write out what to do. Sociol ogically, TVs act like a social glue which brings people together by giving them similar information regardless of their geographic boundaries. In public sphere promotion, they create a means through which citizens can share their ideas (Odugbemi, 2008, p. 37). If we consider a disaster case like in cases of fire accidents, TV journalists are always punctual and ready to inform the public about what had just happened. Einwiller, Carroll and Korn (2010, p. 299) asserts that through appropriate coordination, journalists liaise with presenters in the broadcasting such news. However, the detail remains that journalists are always not present on the happening of the accidents. Then how do they get to know what had happened? This can be done through journalists questioning the people who were present during the happening. They can even put them on camera as they give their account of what had happened (Hurvitz, 2001, p. 12). Through such sharing, the public can be able to estimate the ca uses of the accident and the effects. Televisions are among the best agents of public sphere promotions since their events can be visually examined. According to Hurvitz (2001, p. 14) televisions have also presented peoples views during public demonstrations by giving people a chance to express how they feel about a particular issue of concern. Citizens public demonstrations can be of no use if they cannot be given a chance to express themselves. Their demonstrations can